Larry Cook – Just The Facts

In early 2016 I discovered Larry Cook’s official position as Executive Director for the CNDA via the California Secretary of State website


On February 26, 2016 I initiated the long since deleted conversation you see below.  The exchange took place in Cook’s Stop Mandatory Vaccination Facebook group.

Larry clarificationedit2

Amazingly, during the since deleted February 26, 2016 exchange (and I do mean during) Brandy Vaughan sent a Private Message attempting to intervene.

The “stupid article” which Brandy refers to can be found here.

My exchange with Cook continued…



*Note: According to “He was the Executive Director at the California Naturopathic Doctors Association from 2012 to 2016.”
Let’s take a look beginning “About 4 years ago” with FILING NUMBER: 1635912 FILED ON: 1/31/2012 10:17:02 AM  
FILING NUMBER: 1635912 FILED ON: 1/31/2012 10:17:02 AM
FILING NUMBER: 1657275 FILED ON: 4/30/2012 11:52:04 AM
FILING NUMBER: 1677826 FILED ON: 7/30/2012 5:02:02 PM
FILING NUMBER: 1707437 FILED ON: 10/30/2012 12:58:01 PM
FILING NUMBER: 1739852 FILED ON: 1/31/2013 2:38:02 PM
FILING NUMBER: 1764938 FILED ON: 4/30/2013 11:35:51 AM
FILING NUMBER: 1779009 FILED ON: 7/26/2013 4:23:51 PM
 FILING NUMBER: 1799546 FILED ON: 10/30/2013 12:55:01 PM
FILING NUMBER: 1811864 FILED ON: 1/22/2014 1:00:07 PM
Angela6FILING NUMBER: 1839187 FILED ON: 4/17/2014 12:21:03 PM 
*Note: FILING NUMBER: 1868226 FILED ON: 7/29/2014 9:46:04 AM is the first “About 4 years ago” filing to list Larry Cook as Executive Director.
FILING NUMBER: 1903726 FILED ON: 10/23/2014 11:53:03 AM
FILING NUMBER: 1930029 FILED ON: 1/26/2015 4:16:02 PM 
 FILING NUMBER: 1964172 FILED ON: 4/29/2015 2:58:03 PM
FILING NUMBER: 1975794 FILED ON: 7/21/2015 4:25:04 PM
FILING NUMBER: 1993379 FILED ON: 10/22/2015 2:34:03 PM
FILING NUMBER: 2007294 FILED ON: 1/26/2016 3:53:03 PM
*Note: FILING NUMBER: 2034372 FILED ON: 4/28/2016 12:17:59 PM is the first “About 4 years ago” filing to NOT list Larry Cook as Executive Director.
FILING NUMBER: 2059117 FILED ON: 7/27/2016 10:19:02 AM
FILING NUMBER: 2095056 FILED ON: 10/25/2016 10:22:05 AM
And CNDA’s most recent filing to date…
FILING NUMBER: 2124531 FILED ON: 1/26/2017 1:27:36 PM
Let’s review the facts.
1.) FILING NUMBER: 1868226 FILED ON: 7/29/2014 9:46:04 AM is the first “About 4 years ago” filing to list Larry Cook as Executive Director.
2.) FILING NUMBER: 2034372 FILED ON: 4/28/2016 12:17:59 PM is the first “About 4 years ago” filing to NOT list Larry Cook as Executive Director.
3.) There are 7 “About 4 years ago” filings that list Larry Cook as Executive Director.
By the way, 34 days after my February 26, 2016 exchange with Cook, I have resigned as their Executive Director, effective April 2nd, 2016.
*Note: FILING NUMBER: 2007294 FILED ON: 1/26/2016 3:53:03 PM was the last filing to list Cook as Executive Director and FILING NUMBER: 2034372 FILED ON: 4/28/2016 12:17:59 PM was the first filing to NOT list Cook as Executive Director. 
Many questions remain unanswered to this day.  For example, 
Why does the following March 31, 2013 ad list Larry Cook as “Operations Director” while states “He was the Executive Director at the California Naturopathic Doctors Association from 2012 to 2016?
Why did the CNDA website list Larry Cook as their “Operations Director” on September 26, 2016 if Cook’s “Executive Director” resignation was effective April 2, 2016?
Why does the CNDA website continue to list Larry Cook as their “Operations Director” on April 4, 2017 if his resignation was effective April 2, 2016?
Why did the CNDA pay Capitol Partners, LLC $33,500 to lobby SB277 after SB277 had been signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday, June 30, 2015? 
*Note The SB277Referendum took place between 7/01/2015 – 09/30/2015. 
Did you know SB535 was introduced by Senator Pan February 26, 2015? 
SB535 was a Bill to encourage economic development in the downtown area of the City of the Sacramento which begs the question. Why was the CNDA lobbying either for or against SB535? 
I’ll leave you with this, on February 28, 2016 I posted the following in the Facebook group Awake California.  
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.

Hypocrisy is a Choice





HYPOCRISY: rrrpressreleasechoicerrrpressrelease




secondac secondacpb


rrrpberrrflyersothat SOURCE:rrrprintablehandouttmpchoicefraudedith1




The Truth Unfolds EXPOSED


The Truth Unfolds is a Facebook page that can be found here:

A page that has not been shy in their support of Revolt Revoke Restore and their libelous litigator Todd Matthew Phillips. 


A page that has incessantly harassed and defamed not only myself but others such as anti-GMO activists Zen Honeycutt and Anne Temple.  


A page that has incessantly harassed and defamed the film VAXXED, Christina Hildebrand, Joshua Coleman, Jim Turner, Robert Moxley, Tim Bolen, Nico LaHood, Alan Davis, Jennifer Kennedy, Jen Colleen, Kimberly McCauley, Nicole Noreen, Jude Giudice Tovatt, Kristen Hundley, Aaron Mills and Larry Cook among others. 

A page where Todd Matthew Phillips has failed to delete his posts in direct violation of a Permanent Restraining Order issued on September 8, 2016 but I digress.   


A Facebook page that will no longer spew their vile nonsense with complete anonymity due to their own stupidity.  I’ll explain…

On January 5, 2016 I published Eviscerating Revolt Revoke Restore’s Appeal Narrative “for the record”  A blog post The Truth Unfolds obviously read and didn’t care for as evidenced by their 8:50 A.M. Facebook post the same day. 


Next, I shared their post to my own personal page at 10:09 A.M. adding the comment “There is only one Rule 8.121 This is why The Truth Unfolds will remain the dumbest page on Facebook.”


An exchange of comments with The Truth Unfolds ensued on my personal Facebook page. During this exchange I intentionally deleted one of my comments hoping The Truth Unfolds would be dumb enough to post my deleted comment on their page. 


As you can see below The Truth Unfolds took the bait and in the process inadvertently revealed the identity of at least one individual responsible for The Truth Unfolds page.  


whoopsMeet Tracy Madlener.



Madlener’s YouTube channel


Below is a clip published on June 12, 2015 from an interview that Tracy Madlener did with California Attorney T. Matthew Phillips regarding the class action lawsuit he filed and eventually voluntarily dismissed against Monsanto.   

Below Madlener chats with Zen Honeycutt.  

Why would Tracy Madlener not only support Revolt Revoke Restore and Todd Matthew Phillips but be associated with a Facebook page which attacks anti-GMO activists Zen Honeycutt and Anne Temple? 



WAKESHEEP exposes liars for truths sake in order to cultivate transparency.

TRUTH is a unique force in the universe. TRUTH, unlike an opinion, is not open to reasonable debate. Any reasonable person presented with the TRUTH will agree with it, so by definition, any debate or resistance must be unreasonable. The TRUTH shouldn’t be forced on people, but it should be available to people who need it.

Follow WAKESHEEP out of interest, not obligation.









Eviscerating Revolt Revoke Restore’s Appeal Narrative “for the record”

Revolt Revoke Restore and their libelous litigator have been perpetuating a false narrative concerning their appeal.  Eviscerating this false narrative is hardly difficult. 

First, you can file a Notice of Appeal as soon as the order or judgment is signed by the superior court judge and file-stamped by the court clerk.  The judgement was signed by Superior Court Judge Gregory W. Alarcon and file-stamped by the court clerk on October 21, 2016. 


Despite the fact that the judgement was signed by Superior Court Judge Gregory W. Alarcon and file-stamped by the court clerk October 21, 2016 an appeal was not filed until December 6, 2016. Or so activists were told.



Aside from the fact Revolt Revoke Restore’s post preceded their own attorneys verbatim post by 44 minutes (WTF?) was the Notice of Appeal “officially filed” on December 6, 2016 as claimed?  Of course not. 

EXHIBIT A:  December 10, 2016 Public Records Act Request


How does a letter from the Attorney General dated December 22, 2016 read, “The Attorney General’s Office does not know if Mr. Phillips has filed this Notice of Appeal or if a $775 filing fee accompanied this Notice of Appeal” if the appeal was “officially filed” on December 6, 2016?  

Clearly it wasn’t “officially filed” on December 6, 2016.  Instead, a PDF file of Form APP-002 was emailed to the Attorney General.    

EXHIBIT B:  Email 


EXHIBIT C:  Form APP-002




If you still aren’t convinced you were lied to on December 6, 2016 feast your eyes on the January 3, 2016 Facebook post from Revolt Revoke Restore pictured below.  


From the Courts: The Judicial Branch of California website.


On what planet is January 3, 2016 within 10 days of December 6, 2016? 



The results of your search on the website will be:


Pay no attention to the fact January 3, 2016 is exactly 10 days from December 20, 2016.  






Who is NOSB18.ORG?

Have you visited the website being promoted via the Capitol Resource Institute Facebook page?


Have you visited the No on SB 18 Facebook page


Can CAPITOL RESOURCE INSTITUTE have a ‘CITIZEN LOBBY DAY’ considering Federal tax law requires that a 501(c)(3) nonprofit NOT carry on substantial lobbying activity?


Who is Capitol Resource Institute? I decided to dig a little deeper.  

According to the Capitol Resource Institute Facebook page the website went “LIVE” on December 16, 2016. 


Next, I visited the Attorney General’s website to search the ‘Files of the Registry of Charitable Trusts’ for more information on the Capitol Research Institute.  The Registry Search tool allows a registrant’s public filings to be viewed and downloaded from the Registry database. These public filings include a copy of the annual informational return (Forms 990, 990-PF, and 990-EZ) filed with the Registry, as well as registration forms and documents that organizations are required to file. My search of ‘Capitol’ yielded the following results on page 3. 


CAPITOL RESOURCE FAMILY IMPACT, INC. filed their ‘Initial Registration Form’ July 2, 2008.  cfri

On October 10, 2013 CAPITOL RESOURCE FAMILY IMPACT, INC. received the following ‘WARNING’: 




On December 24, 2013 CAPITOL RESOURCE FAMILY IMPACT, INC. was sent a ‘Notice of Intent to Suspend or Revoke Registration’.  


On February 27, 2014 the ‘Registration Status’ of CAPITOL RESOURCE FAMILY IMPACT, INC. read SUSPENDED.    


On April 24, 2014, less than 2 months after CAPITOL RESOURCE FAMILY IMPACT, INC.’s ‘Registration Status’ read SUSPENDED, Karen England of CAPITOL RESOURCE INSTITUTE said, “After 27 years, all of the sudden about 9 months ago we got a letter saying your tax exempt status has been revoked.” (video below) 

For those wondering how April 24, 2014 magically morphed into “about 9 months ago” when the notices dated October 10th, 2013, November 18th, 2013 and December 24th, 2013 were in reality 4, 5 and 6 months prior I can only offer one explanation.


Meanwhile, around the same time CAPITOL RESOURCE FAMILY IMPACT, INC. was SUSPENDED Karen England filed an ‘Annual Registration Renewal Fee Report’ for CAPITOL RESOURCE INSTITUTE listing ‘Gross annual revenue’ of $219,589.00.      


I encourage you to read all 34 CAPITOL RESOURCE INSTITUTE ‘Related Documents’ available on the Attorney General’s website.  Why?  Because SB277 has previously demonstrated not all charities are legitimate and aboveboard. 

Would you believe CAPITOL RESOURCE INSTITUTE documents on the California Attorney General’s website are similar to the CAPITOL RESOURCE FAMILY IMPACT, INC. documents?  It’s true.  For example:


Why does each CAPITOL RESOURCE INSTITUTE entity pictured below yield zero filings with the California Secretary of State after 29 years?   


*The irony of holding a ‘CITIZEN LOBBY DAY’ at the California Secretary of State Auditorium while not filing with the California Secretary of State is undeniable.     

How is Capitol Research Institute’s involvement with SB18 not in direct violation of their own RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION?  









#SB18 Ballot Measure?

If Ruth Elizabeth “Bette” Davis were still with us, she’d have a piece of advice for the now mobilizing anti-#SB18 ARMY:  “Better buckle up. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.”

The information you are about to read was obtained while researching #SB18 and the PAN FOR SENATE 2018 committee on the California Secretary of State website.   

If you thought the previous posts titled Common Sense Media’s #BS18 and Kids In Common #SB18 were of concern guess again.  Buckle up! 


Please take a look at the ‘PAN FOR SENATE 2018’ Contributions Made page pictured below.panc

Please note the $4,900 “contribution” the PAN FOR SENATE 2018 committee made to the ‘Pan Ballot Measure’ committee. Yes, apparently Dr. Dick makes campaign contributions to himself.  

Next, I searched the California Secretary of State’s website for the ‘Pan Ballot Measure’ committee who received the $4,900 “contribution” and found ENTITY ID #1347510 pictured below


Apparently the ‘Pan Ballot Measure’ committee considered the $4,900 a loan as it was clearly reported as a loan.   


Did you notice the DATE DUE of 9/15/16?  Do you think the ‘Pan Ballot Measure’ committee has paid back the 0% interest loan Senator Pan made to his own ‘Pan Ballot Measure’ committee?  Nope.  

According to the CAMPAIGN STATEMENT (pictured below) the loan is listed as an ‘Outstanding Debt’.


And here is where it gets really interesting. I almost threw up.


If you don’t understand where Sen. Pan’s $50,013.50 in ‘Miscellaneous Increases to Cash’ came from read A Grassroots Epidemic Of Apathy published May 31, 2016.  Amazingly, the Grassroots Epidemic Of Apathy I wrote about 7 months ago continues. 

To this day, the Pan Recall committee remains “ACTIVE” but I digress.

recallstillactiveAnyway, back to the topic of this blog post.

Ballot Measures 

There are two ways a measure can be placed on the ballot.

  • The Legislature has the ability to place constitutional amendments, bond measures, and proposed changes in law on the ballot.

  • Any California voter can put an initiative or a referendum on the ballot by following the “How to Qualify an Initiative process.”

Once a measure has qualified for the ballot, it can be found on the Qualified Statewide Ballot Measures page.

Please read the suggested deadlines (PDF) to qualify initiatives for the 2018 Election Cycle.   

It’s not as if we don’t know there is a problem: we most certainly do.   

The Elephant In The Room. panelephantinroom

Remember, the Legislature has the ability to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot.  Is it possible the ‘Pan Ballot Measure’ committee is preparing to place a #SB18 constitutional amendment on the 2018 ballot?