Revolt Revoke Restore Flawsuit Data Dump

Transparency  

The state in which all relevant information is fully and freely available to the public.

In the interest of transparency I have provided a link to each court document filed to date.  Simply click any of the RED numbers (1-19) below and READ.  

Date Filed # Docket Text
08/29/2016 19 Receipt of Acknowledgement of remand documents by Los Angeles Superior Court, case no. BC617766. (lom) (Entered: 09/01/2016)
Date Filed # Docket Text
08/05/2016 18 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Los Angeles, CA 90012. (bm) (Entered: 08/05/2016)
08/04/2016 17 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS re: Defendant’s Response to Order to Show Cause [Dkt. 15] by Judge George H. King: For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that Defendant has failed to set forth a persuasive reason as to why we should exercise our discretion to retain jurisdiction over the claims in the SAC. Accordingly, we REMAND this action to the state court from which it was removed. The clerk shall effectuate such remand forthwith. Defendant’s Motion to Transfer Venue, [Dkt. 7], is DENIED, without prejudice, as moot. The hearing set for Monday, August 22, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED and TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. (see document for further details) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) (Entered: 08/05/2016)
Date Filed # Docket Text
08/02/2016 16 REPLY to Defendant’s Response re OSC filed by Plaintiff Dawnielle Selden. (Phillips, T) (Entered: 08/02/2016)
08/01/2016 15 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Karen Smithto Order on Motion to Amend/Correct,,, 12 (Rich, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/01/2016)
07/26/2016 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order re: Ex Parte Application for an Order Allowing Plaintiffs to File Their Second Amended Complaint [Dkt. 8] by Judge George H. King granting 8 EX PARTE APPLICATION: Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Application is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Proposed Second Amended Complaint, [Dkt. 8-2], is deemed filed and served as the Second Amended Complaint as of July 21, 2016. In light of the foregoing, Defendant is ORDERED to show cause in writing, within 7 days hereof, why we should not exercise our discretion to remand this action. Failure to timely and adequately show cause as required herein shall be deemed Defendant’ s admission that remand is proper. In that event, this action will be remanded to the state court from which it was removed. (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 07/26/2016)
07/25/2016 14 ORDER APPROVING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY DEFENDANT’S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge George H. King, re Stipulation 9 : After considering the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Stay Defendant’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Stipulation), and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The time within which Defendant is to respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is stayed pending the disposition of Plaintiffs’ request for leave of Court to file their Second Amended Complaint and remand, and Defendants anticipated motion to transfer venue. 2. Upon resolution of the various aforementioned motions, the Court will issue an order setting a new deadline by which, upon reasonable notice, Defendant is to file her response to the operative pleading in this case. (bm) (Entered: 07/26/2016)
07/24/2016 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Phillips, T) (Entered: 07/24/2016)
07/21/2016 13 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants DOES, Karen Smith amending First Amended Complaint, filed by plaintiffs Serge Eustache, Sarah Lucas, Tricia Eustache, Sharon Brown, Nikki Jencen, Tamara Buck, Charlene Housen, Dawnielle Selden (bm) (Entered: 07/26/2016)
07/21/2016 10 Opposition in opposition to re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to 8 filed by Defendant Karen Smith. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Jonathan E. Rich)(Rich, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/21/2016)
07/21/2016 9 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to undetermined date re Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Karen Smith. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Rich, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/21/2016)
07/21/2016 8 EX PARTE APPLICATION to filed by plaintiff Tamara Buck. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Supplement Second Amended Complaint) (Phillips, T) (Entered: 07/21/2016)
07/21/2016 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Southern District of California filed by Defendant Karen Smith. Motion set for hearing on 8/22/2016 at 09:30 AM before Judge George H. King. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion, # 2 Proposed Order) (Rich, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/21/2016)
07/20/2016 6 ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT by Judge George H. King: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge George H. King. The court fully adheres to Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which, as amended as of December 1, 2015, requires that the Rules be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination ofevery action and proceeding. Counsel shall also be guided by the following special requirements, some of which are more specific than those set out in the Local Rules: (Please see attached document for further details), (dgon) (Entered: 07/20/2016)
07/14/2016 5 NOTICE of Assigned Counsel filed by Defendant Karen Smith. (Rich, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/14/2016)
07/13/2016 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. King and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) (Entered: 07/13/2016)
07/12/2016 CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Serge Eustache, Sarah Lucas, Tricia Eustache, Sharon Brown, Nikki Jencen, Tamara Buck, Charlene Housen, and Dawnielle Selden in Los Angeles Superior Court on June 28, 2016, and attached to Notice of Removal as Exhibit C.(jtil) (Entered: 07/13/2016)
07/12/2016 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Serge Eustache, Sarah Lucas, Tricia Eustache, Sharon Brown, Nikki Jencen, Tamara Buck, Charlene Housen, Dawnielle Selden, in Los Angeles Superior Court on 4/22/2016, and attached to Notice of Removal 1 as Exhibit 1. (jtil) (Entered: 07/13/2016)
07/12/2016 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Karen Smith. (Rich, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/12/2016)
07/12/2016 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant All Defendants, (Rich, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/12/2016)
07/12/2016 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC 617766 Receipt No: 0973-18172154 – Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Karen Smith. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Part One, # 2 Exhibit A-Part Two, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C-Part One, # 5 Exhibit C-Part Two, # 6 Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit E, # 8 Exhibit F-Part One, # 9 Exhibit F-Part Two, # 10 Exhibit G, # 11 Exhibit H, # 12 Exhibit I) (Attorney Jonathan E Rich added to party Karen Smith(pty:dft))(Rich, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/12/2016)
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s